Oklahoma: Malpractice Payment of $6,450,000 for Claim by a Patient (2004)

In 2004, a medical malpractice insurance company made a payment on behalf of a registered nurse in Oklahoma for approximately* $6,450,000. Payment was made in response to a claim of medical malpractice claim involving an undescribed outcome involving a patient of unknown age. The nature of the claim is broadly described as: "IV & blood products related." The payment report submitted by a medical malpractice payer described the allegations in the claim as "An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation."

* The payment amount is approximate because the National Practitioner Data Bank codes payments as a range value. The report's description of $6,450,000 corresponds to a malpractice payment somewhere between $6,400,001 and $6,500,000.

Claim at a Glance

Year of Payment: 2004

Location: Oklahoma

Allegation: An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation

Act or Omission: 2000

Payment Range: Between $6,400,001 and $6,500,000

Nature of Claim: IV & Blood Products Related

Payer: Insurance Company - Primary Coverage

Type of Care: Unknown

Reporter: A Medical Malpractice Payer

Claim Insights

With respect to any medical malpractice payment, there are three major components of any claim. First, there is the act or omission that gave rise to an injury and whether the provider departed from an accepted standard of practice. Second, there is the nature of the injury itself, which includes several factors like its severity, duration, the impact on the patient’s life, the age and general health of the patient, along with many other elements. Third, there needs to be a causal connection between the negligent act or omission by the provider and the injury itself. Even with a showing of negligence, a medical provider is not legally responsible for an outcome that was not caused by the negligence.

With this in mind, the Data Bank does have some information that can give context to the medical malpractice payments, including the patient’s age, gender, whether it was inpatient or outpatient care, the type of malpractice or medical mistake that was alleged, and the ultimate outcome to the patient.

The information has significant limitations, however, that everyone should keep in mind. For one thing, the information is usually self-reported by the healthcare provider and his or her representatives. When reviewing this information, you should consider whether the patient would have described his or her injury as “minor” or “temporary” or “emotional only.” Further, there are important aspects of any claim valuation that simply cannot work in a database. Flagrant negligence might be coded the same way as what could be described as a smaller error, and one would have no way of knowing from these data. But even with these limitations and even where some required information is missing from any particular report, each of the payment reports in the database have enough to provide some insightful information that can help evaluate medical malpractice claims going forward.

Provider History Includes Two Licensure Reports

A medical provider's malpractice history can be extremely insightful. A long history of malpractice claims and discipline can certainly affect whether a matter is resolved and for how much. One of the most important goals of the National Practitioner Data Bank is to track providers' disciplinary and malpractice payment history throughout interstate moves or new employment situations.

In addition to this particular malpractice payment, this provider has two other types of reports on record that are worth noting. First, the database reflects that this particular provider had two licensure report(s) on record. These are more unusual among the providers for whom malpractice payments are recorded in the database - only about 15% of the providers with malpractice payments also have at least one licensure report as well.

Second, this provider has an exclusion report on record. The Office of the Inspector General keeps a database on providers who are excluded from Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal programs. The provider in this matter has such a report associated with them in the database.

Provider Detail

Alerts 4

Oklahoma

Registered Nurse

Age: Between 50 and 60 Years Old in 2000 When Allegations Arose

Education Completed: Between 1970 and 1980

Malpractice Payments 1
This is the only payment in the database for this provider.
Licensure Reports 2
Adverse actions by the state licensing board are reported to the NPDB. Some of these actions are public, but some are not. All adverse actions must be reported in this database, whether or not they are public.
Exclusion Reports 1
This report means a temporary or permanent barring from participation in a federal or state health-related program, e.g. Medicare and Medicaid, such that those entities will not reimburse the provider for services.
Payments

Similar Claims

Here are other claims involving an allegation of An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation and an outcome of an undescribed outcome involving a patient of unknown age.
YearStateAmountAllegation
2021North Carolina$2,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2021California$67,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2021California$67,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2020Texas$50An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2020Florida$745,000An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2020Missouri$8,750An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2020Washington$37,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2019Florida$750An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2018Oregon$87,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation
2018Hawaii$67,500An Otherwise Unclassified Allegation