New Mexico: Malpractice Payment of $195,000 for Injury to a Male Patient in his 50s (2013)

In 2013, a medical malpractice insurance company made a payment on behalf of an osteopathic physician (DO) in New Mexico for approximately* $195,000. Payment was made in response to a claim of medical malpractice claim involving what was described as a "minor permanent injury" to a male patient between 50 and 60 years old. The nature of the claim is broadly described as: "surgery related." The payment report submitted by a medical malpractice payer described the allegations in the claim as "Unnecessary Procedure" and "Unnecessary Treatment."

* The payment amount is approximate because the National Practitioner Data Bank codes payments as a range value. The report's description of $195,000 corresponds to a malpractice payment somewhere between $190,001 and $200,000.

Claim at a Glance

Year of Payment: 2013

Location: New Mexico

First Allegation: Unnecessary Procedure

Second Allegation: Unnecessary Treatment

Act or Omission: 2007

Second Act or Omission: 2007

Payment Range: Between $190,001 and $200,000

Nature of Claim: Surgery Related

Payer: Insurance Company

Type of Care: Inpatient

Reporter: A Medical Malpractice Payer

Claim Insights

With respect to any medical malpractice payment, there are three major components of any claim. First, there is the act or omission that gave rise to an injury and whether the provider departed from an accepted standard of practice. Second, there is the nature of the injury itself, which includes several factors like its severity, duration, the impact on the patient’s life, the age and general health of the patient, along with many other elements. Third, there needs to be a causal connection between the negligent act or omission by the provider and the injury itself. Even with a showing of negligence, a medical provider is not legally responsible for an outcome that was not caused by the negligence.

With this in mind, the Data Bank does have some information that can give context to the medical malpractice payments, including the patient’s age, gender, whether it was inpatient or outpatient care, the type of malpractice or medical mistake that was alleged, and the ultimate outcome to the patient.

The information has significant limitations, however, that everyone should keep in mind. For one thing, the information is usually self-reported by the healthcare provider and his or her representatives. When reviewing this information, you should consider whether the patient would have described his or her injury as “minor” or “temporary” or “emotional only.” Further, there are important aspects of any claim valuation that simply cannot work in a database. Flagrant negligence might be coded the same way as what could be described as a smaller error, and one would have no way of knowing from these data. But even with these limitations and even where some required information is missing from any particular report, each of the payment reports in the database have enough to provide some insightful information that can help evaluate medical malpractice claims going forward.

This Provider Has 14 Malpractice Payments in the Database

A medical provider's malpractice history can be extremely insightful. A long history of malpractice claims and discipline can certainly affect whether a matter is resolved and for how much. One of the most important goals of the National Practitioner Data Bank is to track providers' disciplinary and malpractice payment history throughout interstate moves or new employment situations.

In addition to this particular malpractice payment, this provider has three other types of reports on record that are worth noting. First, this provider has a total of 14 malpractice payments in the database. This is a highly concerning number of medical malpractice payments. To put this number in perspective, throughout over 200,000 payment records, approximately 55% of them are associated with providers with multiple payments. This provider's total of 14 malpractice payments is more than 99% of all providers in the database, which is limited to providers with malpractice payment history.

Second, the database reflects that this particular provider has a licensure report on record. These are more unusual among the providers for whom malpractice payments are recorded in the database - only about 15% of the providers with malpractice payments also have at least one licensure report as well.

Third, this provider has two clinical privileges or panel member reports on record. These reports are important to set limits on what types of actions and procedures a provider is allowed to perform in case they move to another state to practice. Only about 4% of payments in the database are associated with a provider with even one such report on their record.

Provider Detail

Alerts 17

New Mexico

Osteopathic Physician (DO)

Age: Between 50 and 60 Years Old in 2007 When Allegations Arose

Education Completed: Between 1980 and 1990

Malpractice Payments 14
There are other payments in the database associated with this provider:
YearStateAmountAllegation
2012New Mexico$165,000Unnecessary Treatment
2012New Mexico$105,000Wrong or Misdiagnosis
2013New Mexico$195,000Unnecessary Procedure
2013New Mexico$6,250Failure to Treat
2014New Mexico$545,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$395,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$195,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$185,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$185,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$2,350,000Unnecessary Procedure
2015New Mexico$10,500,000Unnecessary Procedure
2016New Mexico$10,500,000Unnecessary Treatment
Licensure Reports 1
Adverse actions by the state licensing board are reported to the NPDB. Some of these actions are public, but some are not. All adverse actions must be reported in this database, whether or not they are public.
Clinical Privilege Reports 2
Clinical privileges are rights that providers have to work on staff at a medical facility and to perform particular procedures. When the facility restricts those privileges because of an investigation into improper conduct or incompetence, a report is required. Adverse actions restricting clinical privileges also give rise to these reports.
Payments

Similar Claims

Here are other claims involving an allegation of Unnecessary Procedure and an outcome of what was described as a "minor permanent injury" to a patient between 50 and 60 years old.
YearStateAmountAllegation
2023Pennsylvania$175,000Unnecessary Procedure
2023Mississippi$245,000Unnecessary Procedure
2023California$27,500Unnecessary Procedure
2023Florida$495,000Unnecessary Procedure
2023Washington$165,000Unnecessary Procedure
2023New York$245,000Unnecessary Procedure
2022New Mexico$245,000Unnecessary Procedure
2022Pennsylvania$105,000Unnecessary Procedure
2022Virginia$225,000Unnecessary Procedure
2021Louisiana$27,500Unnecessary Procedure