Illinois: Malpractice Payment of $495,000 for Injury to a Female Patient in her 50s (2018)

In 2018, a non-insurance malpractice payment was made on behalf of an osteopathic physician (DO) in Illinois for approximately* $495,000. Payment was made in response to a claim of medical malpractice claim involving an injury along the lines of quadriplegia, brain damage, or the need for lifelong care suffered by a female patient between 50 and 60 years old. The nature of the claim is broadly described as: "treatment related." The payment report submitted by a state guarantee fund described the allegations in the claim as "Failure to Perform Procedure."

* The payment amount is approximate because the National Practitioner Data Bank codes payments as a range value. The report's description of $495,000 corresponds to a malpractice payment somewhere between $490,001 and $500,000.

Claim at a Glance

Year of Payment: 2018

Location: Illinois

Allegation: Failure to Perform Procedure

Act or Omission: 2017

Payment Range: Between $490,001 and $500,000

Nature of Claim: Treatment Related

Payer: Insurance Guaranty Fund

Type of Care: Outpatient

Reporter: A State Guarantee Fund

Claim Insights

With respect to any medical malpractice payment, there are three major components of any claim. First, there is the act or omission that gave rise to an injury and whether the provider departed from an accepted standard of practice. Second, there is the nature of the injury itself, which includes several factors like its severity, duration, the impact on the patient’s life, the age and general health of the patient, along with many other elements. Third, there needs to be a causal connection between the negligent act or omission by the provider and the injury itself. Even with a showing of negligence, a medical provider is not legally responsible for an outcome that was not caused by the negligence.

With this in mind, the Data Bank does have some information that can give context to the medical malpractice payments, including the patient’s age, gender, whether it was inpatient or outpatient care, the type of malpractice or medical mistake that was alleged, and the ultimate outcome to the patient.

The information has significant limitations, however, that everyone should keep in mind. For one thing, the information is usually self-reported by the healthcare provider and his or her representatives. When reviewing this information, you should consider whether the patient would have described his or her injury as “minor” or “temporary” or “emotional only.” Further, there are important aspects of any claim valuation that simply cannot work in a database. Flagrant negligence might be coded the same way as what could be described as a smaller error, and one would have no way of knowing from these data. But even with these limitations and even where some required information is missing from any particular report, each of the payment reports in the database have enough to provide some insightful information that can help evaluate medical malpractice claims going forward.

Provider History Includes Six Licensure Reports

A medical provider's malpractice history can be extremely insightful. A long history of malpractice claims and discipline can certainly affect whether a matter is resolved and for how much. One of the most important goals of the National Practitioner Data Bank is to track providers' disciplinary and malpractice payment history throughout interstate moves or new employment situations.

In addition to this particular malpractice payment, this provider has two other types of reports on record that are worth noting. First, the database reflects that this particular provider had six licensure report(s) on record. These are more unusual among the providers for whom malpractice payments are recorded in the database - only about 15% of the providers with malpractice payments also have at least one licensure report as well.

Second, this provider has two clinical privileges or panel member reports on record. These reports are important to set limits on what types of actions and procedures a provider is allowed to perform in case they move to another state to practice. Only about 4% of payments in the database are associated with a provider with even one such report on their record.

Provider Detail

Alerts 9

Illinois

Osteopathic Physician (DO)

Age: Between 40 and 50 Years Old in 2017 When Allegations Arose

Education Completed: Between 2000 and 2010

Malpractice Payments 1
This is the only payment in the database for this provider.
Licensure Reports 6
Adverse actions by the state licensing board are reported to the NPDB. Some of these actions are public, but some are not. All adverse actions must be reported in this database, whether or not they are public.
Clinical Privilege Reports 2
Clinical privileges are rights that providers have to work on staff at a medical facility and to perform particular procedures. When the facility restricts those privileges because of an investigation into improper conduct or incompetence, a report is required. Adverse actions restricting clinical privileges also give rise to these reports.
Payments

Similar Claims

Here are other claims involving an allegation of Failure to Perform Procedure and an outcome of an injury along the lines of quadriplegia, brain damage, or the need for lifelong care suffered by a patient between 50 and 60 years old.
YearStateAmountAllegation
2024Iowa$1,950,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2019Florida$245,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2019Arizona$995,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2018Illinois$495,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2017Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2016Missouri$895,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2011California$97,500Failure to Perform Procedure
2007Florida$245,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2005Pennsylvania$845,000Failure to Perform Procedure
2005Ohio$675,000Failure to Perform Procedure