Pennsylvania: Malpractice Payment of $97,500 for Injury to a Female Patient in her 60s (2010)

In 2010, a medical malpractice insurance company made a payment on behalf of a physician (MD) in Pennsylvania for approximately* $97,500. Payment was made in response to a claim of medical malpractice claim involving what was described as a "minor permanent injury" to a female patient between 60 and 70 years old. The nature of the claim is broadly described as: "diagnosis related." The payment report submitted by a medical malpractice payer described the allegations in the claim as "Delay in Diagnosis."

* The payment amount is approximate because the National Practitioner Data Bank codes payments as a range value. The report's description of $97,500 corresponds to a malpractice payment somewhere between $95,001 and $100,000.

Claim at a Glance

Year of Payment: 2010

Location: Pennsylvania

Allegation: Delay in Diagnosis

Act or Omission: 2003

Payment Range: Between $95,001 and $100,000

Nature of Claim: Diagnosis Related

Payer: Insurance Company - Primary Coverage

Type of Care: Outpatient

Reporter: A Medical Malpractice Payer

Claim Insights

With respect to any medical malpractice payment, there are three major components of any claim. First, there is the act or omission that gave rise to an injury and whether the provider departed from an accepted standard of practice. Second, there is the nature of the injury itself, which includes several factors like its severity, duration, the impact on the patient’s life, the age and general health of the patient, along with many other elements. Third, there needs to be a causal connection between the negligent act or omission by the provider and the injury itself. Even with a showing of negligence, a medical provider is not legally responsible for an outcome that was not caused by the negligence.

With this in mind, the Data Bank does have some information that can give context to the medical malpractice payments, including the patient’s age, gender, whether it was inpatient or outpatient care, the type of malpractice or medical mistake that was alleged, and the ultimate outcome to the patient.

The information has significant limitations, however, that everyone should keep in mind. For one thing, the information is usually self-reported by the healthcare provider and his or her representatives. When reviewing this information, you should consider whether the patient would have described his or her injury as “minor” or “temporary” or “emotional only.” Further, there are important aspects of any claim valuation that simply cannot work in a database. Flagrant negligence might be coded the same way as what could be described as a smaller error, and one would have no way of knowing from these data. But even with these limitations and even where some required information is missing from any particular report, each of the payment reports in the database have enough to provide some insightful information that can help evaluate medical malpractice claims going forward.

This Provider Has 11 Malpractice Payments in the Database

A medical provider's malpractice history can be extremely insightful. A long history of malpractice claims and discipline can certainly affect whether a matter is resolved and for how much. One of the most important goals of the National Practitioner Data Bank is to track providers' disciplinary and malpractice payment history throughout interstate moves or new employment situations.

In addition to this particular malpractice payment, this provider has another report on record. Specifically, this provider has a total of 11 malpractice payments in the database. This is a highly concerning number of medical malpractice payments. To put this number in perspective, throughout over 200,000 payment records, approximately 55% of them are associated with providers with multiple payments. This provider's total of 11 malpractice payments is more than 99% of all providers in the database, which is limited to providers with malpractice payment history.

Provider Detail

Alerts 11

Pennsylvania

Physician (MD)

Age: Between 70 and 80 Years Old in 2003 When Allegations Arose

Education Completed: Between 1950 and 1960

Malpractice Payments 11
There are other payments in the database associated with this provider:
YearStateAmountAllegation
2007Pennsylvania$495,000Radiology or Imaging Error
2008Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Diagnose
2010Pennsylvania$97,500Delay in Diagnosis
2011Pennsylvania$345,000Radiology or Imaging Error
2013Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Diagnose
2014Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Diagnose
2021Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Diagnose
2022Pennsylvania$495,000Failure to Diagnose
Payments

Similar Claims

Here are other claims involving an allegation of Delay in Diagnosis and an outcome of what was described as a "minor permanent injury" to a patient between 60 and 70 years old.
YearStateAmountAllegation
2024Iowa$145,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024New York$685,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024New York$685,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024New York$795,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024New York$395,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024Utah$245,000Delay in Diagnosis
2024Texas$245,000Delay in Diagnosis
2023Michigan$185,000Delay in Diagnosis
2023Pennsylvania$195,000Delay in Diagnosis
2023Florida$445,000Delay in Diagnosis